 |
|
|
|
|
|
MAGNETIZER
ENGINE PERFORMANCE MAXIMIZER TEST RESULT |
Magnetizer
Fuel Efficiency/Emission Reduction Tests
All
tests performed under Federal EPA Code 40 CFR, Sec. 51.351
These are before & after results with a Magnetizer installed showing reduced
emissions.
Emissions
= Unburned Fuel / Reduction of Emissions = Fuel Savings
Make/Model |
HC
Before |
HC
After |
%
HC Decrease |
CO
Before |
CO
After |
%
CO Decrease |
Chevy
307, V8 |
774 |
580 |
25% |
.06 |
.00 |
100% |
Chevy
400, V8 |
141 |
37 |
73% |
1.78 |
.21 |
88% |
Chevy
2.8L, V6 |
46 |
11 |
76% |
.31 |
.00 |
100% |
’85
Pontiac 6000 |
227 |
42 |
81% |
.33 |
.04 |
89% |
Escort
4 Cyl.1 |
259 |
54 |
79% |
5.9 |
.25 |
96% |
Ford
Pick-Up V8 |
158 |
16 |
90% |
.21 |
.21 |
57% |
’88
Nissan V6 3.0 4x42 |
130 |
30 |
77% |
1.7 |
.00 |
100% |
’84
Chevy V8 |
12 |
0 |
100% |
.00 |
.00 |
--- |
’83
Chevy V6, (C)2 |
72 |
0 |
100% |
.64 |
.01 |
98% |
’78
Olds 280 V6 (C)2 |
348 |
65 |
81% |
.04 |
.01 |
75% |
’82
Lincoln 302 V8 (C)2 |
13 |
4 |
69% |
.05 |
.00 |
100% |
’88
Ford 2.3L (F.I.)2 |
193 |
20 |
90% |
.80 |
.01 |
98% |
’86
Dodge 318 V8 (C)2 |
125 |
15 |
88% |
1.24 |
.02 |
98% |
’87
Jeep 4.0L V62 |
18 |
8 |
55% |
.09 |
.04 |
55% |
’75
Buick 350 V8 (C)2,3 |
128 |
95 |
26% |
4.21 |
4.04 |
4% |
’86
Pontiac |
125 |
0 |
100% |
.04 |
.00 |
100% |
Chevy
Van V8 |
190 |
125 |
65% |
1.8 |
.30 |
81% |
’88
Jeep |
38 |
7 |
81% |
.16 |
.05 |
68% |
Hyundai
4 Cyl.4 |
18 |
14 |
22% |
5.69 |
.02 |
99% |
’91
Suzuki, 4 cyl.a |
170 |
100 |
41% |
1.6 |
.15 |
91% |
Nissan
SXa |
70 |
90 |
+29% |
0.3 |
0.2 |
33% |
’88
Volkswagen, 4 cyl.a |
320 |
270 |
15% |
6.2 |
3.6 |
42% |
’86
Mitsubishi, 4 cyl.a |
390 |
330 |
15% |
3.8 |
2.8 |
26% |
’76
Chevy, 4 cyl.a |
320 |
180 |
44% |
3.6 |
1.0 |
72% |
’87
Oldsmobile |
63 |
0 |
100% |
.06 |
.00 |
100% |
’69
Corvette 350 CID |
383 |
197 |
48% |
7.85 |
1.98 |
74% |
’90
Olds 6 Cyl. |
60 |
48 |
20% |
.32 |
.23 |
31% |
’83
Chevy 305 |
230 |
163 |
20% |
9.83 |
8.60 |
12% |
90
Chevy Luv 1600 cc |
3.96 |
3.20 |
19.2% |
57.3 |
53.7 |
6.3% |
Fiat
126 Polska |
N/A |
N/A |
20% |
N/A |
N/A |
45% |
’79
Chevy 350 CID |
366 |
38 |
90% |
2.77 |
.16 |
94% |
’86
Chevy V6, 2.8L |
19 |
12.5 |
65% |
.02 |
.00 |
100% |
’90
Chevy 350 (C) |
79 |
21 |
73% |
.14 |
.01 |
93% |
’84
BMW 6 Cyl. |
64 |
39 |
39% |
.60 |
.05 |
90% |
Make/Model |
HC
Before |
HC
After |
%
HC Decrease |
CO
Before |
CO
After |
%
CO Decrease |
VW
Quantum 4 cyl (Fuel Savings of 17%)b |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
1.5 |
0.5 |
66% |
’93
Proton 1.5L (Power increase fr/ 58 kw to 59 kw)c |
130 |
100 |
23% |
2.0 |
1.4 |
30% |
Maruti
(India Vehicle) |
100 |
60 |
40% |
2.6 |
1.6 |
30% |
Make/Model |
HC
Before |
HC
After |
%HC
Decrease |
CO
Before |
CO
After |
%CO
Decrease |
Mileage
(+) |
‘
94 Chevy Suburban |
56.0 |
6.0 |
89% |
.10 |
.00 |
100% |
+
27% |
‘
90 Ford Bronco |
69.0 |
10.0 |
86% |
.19 |
.00 |
100% |
+
28.9% |
‘
91 Nissan |
43.0 |
4.0 |
91% |
.00 |
.00 |
0% |
+10.3% |
‘
86 Blazer |
-- |
-- |
36% |
-- |
-- |
13% |
+
50.8% |
D
Truck/V6 Duetz |
-- |
-- |
-- |
40
ppm |
10
ppm |
75%
diesel ppm |
|
(C)
= Carburetor (F.I.) = Fuel Injection
* = Accuracy within +/- .04
a = Guatemalan Report b = Argentinean Test c = Malaysian OEM
Test
1 = Boston Gas Company 2 = On file with Magnexx Corporation
3 = Buick has heavy deposits, must go through stabilization period to attain full
results.
4 Stabilization period only, final not available.
Magnetizer
Fuel Energizer Certified Fuel Savings & Horsepower Increase Tests
-
VTEC
Laboratories – test – 26% drop in fuel consumption.
-
Preliminary
Emissions test by Institute of Aeronautics (Poland) – 40% CO reduction,
20% HC reduction.
-
RV
Power Group – Gulf Stream high rise from 5.34 mpg to 8.08 mpg.
-
Bacon
Equipment Company – 33% horsepower increase (farm tractor).
-
J.P.
Bethlehem, PA – 12.5% faster ¼ mile race time (Corvette).
-
Manner
Automotive Tech – 10% horsepower increase (Chevrolet).
-
Penske
Racing – 4.8% average horsepower gain (full race engine).
-
Tom
McCall, Petrochemical Engineer – de-carbonizing of fuel injection system
and engine.
-
Chile
EPA – 18% Fuel savings.
-
Chinese
test on early prototype Auto Fuel Energizer – 7-10% Fuel savings.
-
Tomei
Industrial Furnace, Taiwan – reduction of 11.7% of heavy oil used.
-
Northern
California Diagnostic Laboratories reported a 5% increase in horsepower
during testing.
-
US
Border Patrol Test (8/10/95) – 94 Chevy Suburban 27.0%, 90 Ford Bronco,
29.8%, 91 Nissan 4 x 4, 10.3%, 86 6.9L Diesel, 50.8%.
-
Electrometal
Ltd. (7/31/95) – Genset (Motor/Generator) – Saved 25% on Diesel Fuel.
-
Wheels
Ltd. (11/04/95) – Two Ambassador’s Vehicles, increased mileage of rental
cars by 17.46% and 18.0% respectively.
-
City
of Berkeley CA – Fuel Economy change: 95 Ford Crown V8, 14.13%, 95 Ford
Crown V8 (2.46%), 90 E-350 Ford Van V8, 7.06%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
