PENSKE DYNO TEST SUMMARY

February 17,1989

Race Car Engine

NOTE: Through the use of the.  MAGNETIZER Fuel Energizer, the dyno-tested Penske race car engine developed an average 4.8 Horse Power gain.  An accompanying graph reflects the percentage gain in Horse Power.  It should be noted that the greatest gains occurs in the lower and higher Horse Power range, as indicated by the divergence in the graphs.  It should also be notes that the Penske Engine represents the highest state of art design in combustion engineering technology.  Consequently, it was amazing that the attachment of a MAGNETIZER unit could provide a meaningful increase In power.

Magnetizer Diesel Smoke Opacity Emission Test

United Motor Car, Sri Lanka

(Importer of Mitsubishi Motor Cars)

Vehicle One

Date: May 17, 1999

Model: Isuzu Pick Up Truck (Owned by Managing Director of Department of Transportation, Sri Lanka)

Lucas Hartridge Free Acceleration Test EEC72/306

Before Magnetizer EES: 30.1 HSU Average

After Magnetizer EES: 11.8 HSU Average

Diesel Emission Reduction: 60.7%

Vehicle Two

Date:May 17, 1999

Model: Toyota Pick Up Truck (Owned by Director of Sri Lankan EPA)

Lucas Hartridge Free Acceleration Test EEC72/306

Before Magnetizer EES: 56.4 HSU Average

After Magnetizer EES: 21.7 HSU Average

Diesel Emission Reduction: 61.2%

IDENTIFIERS:Chevrolet carbureted 307 C.I. V-8, run on a Clayton Dynometer.

TEST 1:

Vehicle was thoroughly warmed up and emissions were run at idle and then the vehicle was adjusted to 55 MPH and horsepower was recorded.

TEST 2:

An FE-1 was installed on fuel line just before carburetor and vehicle was run ten minutes.  The emissions was then tested at idle and the vehi6l6'@ horsepower"was tested at 55 MPH.

CONCLUSIONS

The MAGNETIZED 'Fuel decreased the emissions while increasing the C02 and horsepower - indicating a better, more efficient burning fuel giving a higher BTU output than the normal un-magnetized fuel.

The test was conducted by Dave Manners, racing consultant and engineer.  As an initial test, it was only run ten minutes.  MGI requires testing of longer periods, but a 10 minute test creating a 10% increase in hp is a more than adequate increase in efficiency.  A longer period would indicate much higher results.

(NOTATION:This test was done with our original prototype system.  Our more powerful, final design gives much higher results.)

DOCUMENTED FUEL ECONOMY TEST

The following Fuel Economy Test was conducted with a
1974 Chevrolet 400 Cubic Inch small block automobile. 
Vehicle loads were kept constant throughout.

MPG TEST ------ 1974 CHEV. ------ 400 C.I. ------ SMALL BLOCK

BASELINE (Without FUEL ENERGIZER)

1. 164 Miles     23.7 Gallons     6.9 MPG

2. 169 Miles     26.8 Gallons     6-3 MPG

3. 130 Miles    20.3 Gallons     6.4 MPG

BASELINE (With FUEL ENERGIZER)               PERCENTAGE INCREASE

1. 134 Miles ------ 18.6 Gallons ------ 7.2 MPG ------------------- 10%

2.  74 Miles ------ 9.2 Gallons ------ 8.0 MPG ---------------------- 23%

3.  90 Miles ------ 10.5 Gallons ------ 8.6 MPG -------------------- 32%

4. 167 Miles ------ 19.0 Gallons ------ 8.8 MPG ------------------- 34%

Note:  46.5% of Stabilization Period completed 33.8% efficiency increase.

Magnetizer Fuel Efficiency/Emission Reduction Tests

All tests conducted on internationally approved emissions analyzers.
These are the before and after results with a Magnetizer installed showing reduced emissions.

Emissions = Unburned Fuel IReduction of Emissions =Fuel Savings

International Certified Tests

(1)     = Guatemalan Report                (2)= Argentinean Test          3= Malaysian OEM Test

Magnetizer Fuel Energizer certified Fuel Savings & Horsepower Increase Tests

• VTEC Laboratories - test - 26% drop in fuel consumption.
• Preliminary Emissions test by Institute of Aeronautics (Poland) - 40% CO redt., 20% HC redt.
• RV Power Group - Gulf Stream high rise from 5.34 mpg to 8.08 mpg.
• Bacon Equipment Company - 33% horsepower increase (farm tractor).  J.P. Bethlehem, PA - 12.5% faster 1/4 mile race time (Corvette).
• Manner Automotive Tech - 10% horsepower increase (Chevrolet).
• Penske Racing - 4.8% average horsepower gain (full race engine).
• Tom McCall, Petrochemical Engineer - de-carbonizing of fuel injection system and engine.
• Martin Paving Company - 17% Natural Gas savings.
• Warren Paving Company - 15% Natural Gas savings.
• Highway Materials, Inc. - 12.8% Natural Gas Savings.
• Luhks and Associates, Inc., Engineering - 19-20% Natural Gas savings.
• Stewart Dry Cleaners - 19/8% Natural Gas savings.  Return on investment - 26 days.
• Polish Ministry of Naptha (Gas and Electric) - 18-20% Natural Gas savings.
• Chile EPA - 18% Fuel savings.
• Chinese test on early prototype Auto Fuel Energizer - 7-10% Fuel savings.
• Zaklady Produkcyjno-Handlowe Baker, Poland - 14% savings of Natural Gas.
• Dworaka Bakery, Poland - 15% decrease in use of Natural Gas.
• Krotoszyn Ceramic Works, Poland - 23.3% reduction in gas usage, 30% increase in first quality product output due to reduction of gas carbon specks (result - major profit increase).
• Tomei Industrial Furnace, Taiwan - reduction of 11,7% of heavy oil used.
• Fuel Certified test copies available upon request. (1022/93)

Magnetizer Fuel Efficiency/Emission Reduction Tests
All tests performed under Federal EPA Code 40 CFR, Sec. 51.351
These are before & after results with a Magnetizer installed showing reduced emissions.

Emissions = Unburned Fuel Reduction of Emissions = Fuel Savings

(C) = Carburetor                          (F.I.) Fuel Injection

I = Boston Gas Company                   

2 = On file with Magnexx Corporation

3 = Buick has heavy deposits, must go through stabilization period to attain full results.

4 Stabilization period only, final not available.