BI-POLAR VERSUS MONO-POLAR WATER MAGNETS

The following is a letter sent to one of our distributors by a bi-polar water magnet seller we’ll call Mr. X and Our 2 Responses:

Letter to our distributor from Mr.X

I'm not sure how you guys get away with telling lies. The following is the truth regarding bi-pole versus monopole. If Kulish fed this garbage to you and you bought it you must must be pretty dumb.

1. There is only one magnetic field and that is positive. The flux lines flow from the positive end of the magnet to the negative end. The only difference between the two poles is the direction the positive flux lines are flowing. This is why placing either a positive pole or negative pole of a magnet against the body will give a different effect.

2. Bi-polar treatment of water through a pipe does not cause a hot/cold or canceling effect. If the magnets are placed orthogonal to the flow of water, the positive pole will interact with the negative pole through the pipe creating a very strong positive flux field. The closer the magnets are together, or the larger the magnets, the stronger the field strength in pure positive energy.

3. You state that monople produces a higher field strength than bi-pole and bi-pole treatment has a lower field strength because part of the water flow is treated by the lateral lines of the magnet...garbage.
 

(b) IN FACT ...monopole technology suffers from that exact weakness. The two positive poles forced together compresses the Maxwells and forces the flux lines to the side. The middle of a monopole treatment device such as MAGNETIZER or AQUA-DOC has a very low field strength in the center of the pipe (where the water is!).

4. Since you people insist on putting this garbage on your web site, I will counter with a section on my site entitled "Focus on Monopole"

5. Obviously Pete Koulish didn't have the benefit of a magnetometer when he invented the magnetizer in 1987

My first response to our Distributor:

Dear Stefan,

First, Mr. X certainly does show us his lack of knowledge. Apparently, he does not know about the right and left-hand (chirality) electron spin rule taught in engineering 101. Without such, there would be no positive and negative charges, which to my understanding and the entire physics, engineering, biology and chemistry fields, are still opposites and have exactly the opposite behavior. When the flux lines change at the Bloch Wall of a magnet, that is where the opposite electromagnetic field starts and the opposite resultant behavior occurs.

Mr. X is right about the middle of the mono-pole system - something that has never been important to us because our design calls for a strong positive, right-hand rule vortex entrance and exit [as the water comes into and exits the system] magnetic imprinting field. This kind of vortex design power apparently is beyond Mr. X’s conceptual understanding and is perhaps part of the reasoning behind his rather unscientific explanation of his “so-called” more powerful bi-polar machine.

I have to laugh, because it was my good friend Dr. Tao who told Tom Ashton to use bi-polar when he first designed the system. Tao was only kidding him as he [Tao] knew Ashton was one of our dealers - but Ashton took him seriously as he ripped us off in a fiduciary capacity by designing his bi-polar based on our design patent while sitting on the MGI board as a director.

There is another example of the bi-polar system that its sellers always cry the blues about: Whenever you run a steel rod down the middle of a 2 foot steel pipe with our system strapped on, it will pick up paper clips 2 feet away. Their bi-polar system won't. They always say "Unfair, Unfair." It’s unfair like a Corvette racing a Volkswagon. Simply outclassed power.

Apparently, when Mr. X says that the different poles of a magnet against the human body give different reactions, he does not see the continuity of the same physical mechanisms inherent in the same behavior of the separate poles on a water system. Perhaps the magnetometer he mentions should be replaced with an education on his part. BMX (or their former name Softron or whatever bi or multi-polar system) has always caused me concern pain when people call us up and tell us our system doesn't work and they are actually referring to one of those weak bi-polar systems. We send our standard Hot & Cold Unit Mono-pole Home System and they become satisfied customers. But the unfourtunate  reputation they give magnetics is terrible.

It is simple arithmetic and simple physics: when both positive and negative charges (from the bi-polar system) in the water's eddy currents mix in the natural laminar flow, they have to assume a balance (neutralize) of the opposite potentials - the neutral polarization charge - which is evident in the water’s low voltage measurement. The voltage measurement indicates how much positive voltage is put into the natural negative charge of hardwater to make it soft.

Since the South/Positive magnetic pole is an expanding field and North/Negative pole is a contracting field, there is always an aggregate positive potential with the bi-polar system - not much because the negative potentials cancel out most of the positive. It would be neat if, as Mr. X explains, you could break the laws of physics and get a strong positive charge from both negative and positive poles. Then we wouldn't have to worry about which pole we use. Imagine, we would all be using Edison's useless DC current with it's large voltage line loss with Generating Stations every 2 miles instead of Tesla's polyphase (AC) current that services our contemporary age.

Best regards,

peter

Second response  written directly to Mr. X:

Dear Mr. X,
Last time I used a magnetometer, it showed what was positive and what was negative - both opposite fields, both opposite behaviors. The negative works well  if you need to harden the water very quickly for particulate separation (and a myriad of other ionic behaviors). The positive is excellent for softening and reduced surface tension (and many other things). Mix the 2 potentials together and you will definitely change the charge potential (millivoltage) of hard water. But you cannot raise the potential any higher than the balance (midway/neutral) of the negative and positive potentials.

Unfortunately, the somewhat higher millivoltage of both poles (bi-pole) is often not enough EMF (electromotive force) to saturate a medium [normal hard water] to high diamagnetic TDS (very hard water) factor. In very hard water conditions, even the single positive pole, which gives the highest positive state, is sometimes not strong enough to raise the millivoltage potential enough without the additional energy imput available in the tandem, triandem or quadrandem Magnetizer designed amplified vortex field systems.

If you [Mr. X] really want to get into this (such as your warning that you are going to forum this on web your site), you better run it by a physicist before you get into scientific battle. We will be happy to oblige you in scientific knowledge, but perhaps you want to check your definitions first. I also advise you to contact your attorney before you libel other people.

Respectfully Peter Kulish, Founder
Magnetizer Research Institute
Magnetizer School of Magnets
Magnetizer Group, Inc.